Published in truncated form in Runner's World May 2014
In
1984 Britain was a global force in marathon running, complete with the
world record and an Olympic medal. Now, 30 years later, we pin all our
hopes on one man who’s yet to make his debut. What went wrong, and can
we ever return our winning ways?
Photography:
Justin Wood
When
Mo Farah toes the start line of the 2014 Virgin London Marathon, the
buzz of expectation surrounding him will be electric. His thousands of
home supporters – the Union flag-waving, moboting multitudes – will line
the capital’s streets in frenetic anticipation. We have been waiting a
very long time. Twenty-one years have passed since a British man last
won the London Marathon: Eamonn Martin in 1993. A whole generation of
Britons have grown up never witnessing a fellow countryman break the
tape, not just in London, but in any world-class marathon. Could the
wait finally be over?
London
will be Farah’s debut marathon, just as it was for Martin in 1993, but
the challenge facing Mo is vastly different. Martin, 34 at the time and a
former Commonwealth 10,000m champion, out-kicked Mexican Isidro Rico to clinch victory on Westminster Bridge in 2:10:50. Taking nothing away
from Martin’s achievement, his winning time was the slowest since the
inaugural race in 1981, and is six minutes 10 seconds outside the
current course record, set by Emmanuel Mutai in 2011. In distance terms,
that’s a gap of more than 2km. The Kenyan averaged an astounding 4:45
per mile and covered the decisive 10km split from 30km to 40km in 28:45
(4:38 per mile) – faster than any British man ran for 10k last year.
With
the exception of the 2013 race, which was unusually poorly paced, the
slowest winning time in London over the past six years was 2:05:19 in
2010. That’s nearly two minutes faster than Steve Jones’s 28-year-old
British record. Can we really expect Farah to win on his first attempt?
His Olympic medals are solid (gold) proof that he has the talent, the
outright speed and the guts – plus, he holds the UK half-marathon record
of 60:59. But does he have the even deeper store of endurance needed to
hang with the leaders over 26.2 miles, covering their inevitable brutal
surges before outkicking them to victory? Bear in mind, he will have to
sustain sub-2:06 pace (4:48 per mile) – 10 seconds per mile faster than
Martin in 1993 – just to be in with a chance.
We’ve
every reason to feel optimistic for Mo; after all, the form-book deems
him the best distance runner in the world. Yes, a British runner is the
best in the world – well worth repeating. But, as gratifying as that is,
it raises an awkward question: does Farah’s ascent to the top herald
the UK’s return to the front of the pack in world-class marathon
running? Sadly, the answer is a resounding no. Farah is an exception, a
freakishly fast outlier, vastly more successful than all his British
contemporaries. The same was true of Paula Radcliffe, whose 2:15:25
world record from 2003 remains nearly three minutes ahead of the
second-fastest-ever woman, and an astonishing 7:47 quicker than the
next-fastest British female.
The
story of British marathon running over the past 30 years is one of
bottom-up decline, where only the very top has defied the trend. Paula’s
achievements – and Mo’s potential – distract us from the dire reality,
which is that no other British marathoners, male or female, are getting
anywhere near world-class standard. Our fastest man in 2013 ran 2:15:04 –
nearly 12 minutes adrift of the world lead (Wilson Kipsang’s new world
record of 2:03:23), while our fastest woman clocked 2:30:46 – 10 minutes
wide of the world-leading mark and some 15 minutes slower than Paula’s
world record. Britain’s prospects beyond Mo are quite literally too few
to mention.
It
was not always thus. Thirty years ago, Britain was arguably the best
marathon-running nation in the world, with not only star performers but a
huge depth of talent too. In 1984, no fewer than 75 men broke the 2:20
mark, and the hundredth-fastest man that year clocked a speedy (by
today’s standards) 2:21:32. These days we’re lucky if a dozen men break
2:20 each year, having hit a low point of just five in 2007, when the
hundredth-fastest man clocked a very modest 2:37:14. The extent of the
decline is startling and disconcerting – especially when you consider
how over the same period UK marathon running, in terms of sheer numbers,
has grown spectacularly. So what’s going on?
I
decided to seek out and draw together, within my home county of Sussex,
two people who together should be able to shed some light on what has
changed: the county’s fastest marathoner from then, Derek Stevens, who
ran 2:12:41 in 1984, and our fastest now, Jon Pepper, who clocked
2:19:10 in October 2013. Derek’s PB would easily top the UK rankings
today, but in 1984 it was only good enough for eighth spot. Jon’s best
put him 11th in the UK rankings last year, so his and Derek’s fastest
marathons are of equivalent merit relative to the standard of their day.
Equivalent yet separated by six and a half minutes – more than a mile
of running. How to account for this generational slowdown? Or, more
bluntly, why can’t Brits keep up in marathons anymore?
***
Derek
is now 59, recently retired from a senior position in local government and runs only
occasionally to keep fit; Jon is 25 and squeezes in twice-daily
training around his full-time job as a school science technician. The
three of us meet at Lewes athletics track and take our seats for a
roundtable discussion in the upstairs of the club-house overlooking the
home straight.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2_oDxTV_DwXGqfvrn0TZYVxC4AC7CbW6XAtxMGS0l5WC70ULmTJDBLJp4_o7ZDCLEdIDRceCzx3CxxonuSbNr4wLSMSYwVNtLOdaCnNljIqVpG5T-kMxFU6QSqsOf-_TFO-bE_D3kKJQM/s1600/DerekandJon_sm.jpg) |
Derek Stevens (PB 2:12:41, set in 1984) and Jon Pepper (PB 2:19:10, set in 2013) |
I
begin by quoting Charlie Spedding – whose 2:08:33 from 1985 still
stands as the English record – from an interview in the Independent
where he is responding to the question, why is British distance running
in decline?
“There’s
not one straightforward, simple answer. There are several factors.”
Spedding lists the ones he thinks are most significant. “Children are
not as active as they were 40 or 50 years ago… Teenagers [nowadays] see
people running in fancy dress or trying to lose weight [rather than] as a
serious sport. It’s just not seen as a cool thing for teenagers to be
involved in.”
Derek
is nodding eagerly. “Charlie is right. When I was six or seven years
old [in 1960-61], I was running more than a lot of the athletes today
run. It was play. We used to run and cycle everywhere. Televisions were
still black and white. I think my generation was fundamentally just so
much fitter by the time we got to secondary school.”
“I
definitely agree with that,” Jon says. “I’ve worked in schools since
graduating, and I can’t imagine kids being any less fit [than they are
now]… I’ll do a lap of the field as a warm-up and I’ll find only one out
of 30 can do it without stopping.”
The
suspicion that children have become less fit is backed up by strong and
mounting scientific research. A recent study undertaken by the American
Heart Association involving millions of children of various
nationalities found that on average nine-to-17-year-olds today run 90
seconds per mile slower than their counterparts did 30 years ago –
representing a decline in cardiovascular fitness of five per cent per
decade since 1975.
And
children who are generally less active are naturally less inclined to
get involved in a physically demanding sport like running. Jon sums up
the catch-22 situation:
“If
your level of fitness is low, why the hell would you want to go and
run? It’s horrible when you’re unfit! You can’t really blame them.”
Childhood
activity not only lays the physical foundations for distance running,
it also triggers the urge to compete, often in response to a direct or
perceived challenge thrown down by a rival or role model. Consider this
classic example from Derek:
“Our
school’s sports field was half a mile up a track. We had this cocky
teacher – I was only 11 – and he said, ‘I’ll give anyone a shilling if
they can beat me up to the field’. And I beat him!” His eyes sparkle as
he recalls this seminal victory – the satisfaction is still there,
undimmed over the decades.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD_SEL9BQ_lbwopoBoEKNb-DfUO3MomhJyncwHDTEq6lNx8WqB-64lm0A-IaelDWyKbbnsjF3_8pLh7WTX7pUGcL-02PUFjiPkLx6w-UaqBBSo330F0D98vHTU4SewQzkBn4YuqBgpLB4Z/s1600/DSC_9171.jpg) |
Jon quizzes Derek on how to nail 26.2 Eighties-style |
In
Derek’s heyday, he and others like him had an abundance of role models
to follow: world-beating marathoners like Jones and Spedding, not to
mention track icons like Seb Coe and Steve Ovett. At regional level too,
there were more runners competing at a higher standard, and most clubs
had at least one or two admired high-achievers. Derek’s first club
Bexhill AC counted among its members one of Britain’s all-time greats,
Dave Bedford. “It was a great moment for me, as a 12-year-old, to be
running with the man who was then the best in the world over 10k.”
Later, Derek joined Hastings AC and often travelled to other Sussex
clubs to train among the best in the county. “You need to seek groups
out,” he advises Jon. “I used to come over [to Brighton] and run with
Ovett and Mark Rowland [who still holds the UK record for the 3,000m
steeplechase], and knew I’d get hammered! But you need to do that.”
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhf5efKmCIJ497Wgn8Q7fVeFsIMKp7cE_CR7dJc0clRR_SCGV09ASt6RUMHRoiCbvF9KDAEhS_6NaN_VV4NAZGYWup17GK4F0qDNAFZD1qxoI7cuUwIY4tKoUGuuQfWyNV_1HrI5g1cQqaw/s1600/DSC_9443.jpg) |
Derek: "I'd train with Ovett and get hammered!" |
Jon’s
first club was Enfield and Haringey, and, like Derek, he was inspired
by the man at the front in training. “The top guy in our group was a guy
called Andy Coleman, whose highlight was coming second in the Great
North Run [in 2000]. He ran 62 minutes and nearly won it and was on TV.”
Witnessing his club-mate perform so well in a prestigious race clearly
had a huge impact. “Seeing that, it makes it very real to you, and I was
never looking back then because I realised I could do that. Without
that, who knows; it could have just petered out for me. That was
massive.”
But
unlike Derek and his peers, Jon’s generation has never witnessed
first-hand fellow countrymen winning world-class marathons. Instead, Jon
has admired the stars of Derek’s era in hindsight by poring over
historic results and becoming a self-confessed “running anorak”. “It
seems quite distant,” he admits. “Like something that’s not that real
because you’ve never seen a Briton run that fast.” Indeed, it was not a
Briton but a Kenyan, Sammy Wanjiru – winner of Olympic gold in Beijing
aged just 22 – who inspired Jon to step up to the marathon while still
in his early 20s.
Enchantment
with East African runners is nothing new, of course – Derek reveals
that his boyhood hero was Abebe Bikila, Ethiopian winner of the Olympic
Marathon in 1960 and 1964 – but the competitive balance has dramatically
shifted. Last year alone, East African runners racked up over 130
sub-2:10 performances, whereas not a single Briton has run that fast
since 2005. Have would-be British contenders been put off by what seems
like unbeatable opposition?
“No,”
says Jon. “It should still be a motivating factor to be the best in
Britain.” He flatly rejects the notion that upcoming athletes like him
are put off or held back through drawing international comparisons. “It
must be something within the British running scene that’s the problem.”
Derek
agrees. “It wouldn’t worry me that the East Africans are so good,
because I’d want to be the best in Sussex and the best domestically.”
Former
world cross-country runner-up Tim Hutchings’ diagnosis is that
Britain’s best runners no longer race against one another often enough.
Derek broadly supports this theory, though he emphasises that his
marathon preparation always took precedence over interim races. “I’d
race five or six times within a 16-week schedule, sometimes racing off
100 miles a week.”
Jon
takes a different approach, preferring to taper for tune-up races
rather than sustaining a high volume; he believes structured preparation
with specific efforts works better for him than constant hard training
with frequent racing on top.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXPTaU_NWXUOaADXjYDU2lTydA96r-ic1ZLO_Lljt0wJ6ez_FjVTnK-9K2NGQ8sP9UFcBqcSS6cm7BB8w04kX-EO5DMHc0zjlEN7Azg_W1B6TAimoOAsj5Q1y4fztYMoTA-lCskcxp_QhL/s1600/Derek+Stevens+1+001.jpg) |
Derek won the Grandma's Marathon in Duluth, Minnesota, on 16th June 1984, clocking 2:12:41 |
As
regards the particulars of training, then versus now, it’s striking how
little has changed – despite presumed advances in sports science.
Derek’s regime was based on Arthur Lydiard’s time-honoured principles: a
periodised plan with base-building, strength and anaerobic phases, and
high overall volume.
“I
could always train really hard. Three intense sessions [each week], and
good distance stuff, at a good pace… Over the 16-week build-up, I would
average 95-100 miles a week.”
Jon
has had more injuries to deal with, so his training log reveals more
recovery days between intense sessions and slightly lower overall
mileage. Even so, his and Derek’s training plans are fundamentally
similar, and I doubt that picking apart the minor differences would
yield any telling insight.
The
fact is, Jon and Derek are of the same athletic breed – dedicated,
disciplined and fiercely competitive – but it’s a breed that has become
vanishingly rare. Which is the crux of the problem. Marathoning success
is a numbers game; each nation needs a critical mass of its population
to start young and build a strong aerobic base before undertaking
several years of hard, consistent training. Far fewer Britons are doing
that now, and among the tiny number who are, ‘excellence’ is defined in
relation to one another, so the decline is self-perpetuating.
“I
guess it’s easier now for someone like me to say I’ll try to run 2:18
or 2:16 [rather than a world-class time],” admits Jon, “because I’ll
still be one of the best in the country and that’ll be all right.”
You cannot blame him; reaching sub-2:20 standard requires enormous
commitment - why push even harder when you’re already the best in your
region and one of the best in the country?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhrtlVH5pqukNar5d_Nl1phlnhp6iREVBLJWfPvQjWGNIVOl-xpcwwNSeIsVyhETk_JKr-i0hyphenhyphen-NVYP3963YJy1__gHi4FRd5duJFJ8nuzjrD5DNCv1XSxdf1Ocw93wRqP-ZTYK9YwTE4sr/s1600/Derek+Stevens_top+50+001.jpg) |
Clipping from 1984 notes how Derek's achievements are hardly noticed by the press |
The root of the problem lies not within UK running but around and beyond it. British leisure culture has evolved along the lines of ‘the survival of the unfittest’; with the introduction of new technology and gadgets, sedentary amusements have replaced outdoor play. British youngsters while away their spare time socialising, shopping, or in front of screens, tweeting, texting, gaming – and putting on weight while their aerobic potential withers. Meanwhile, Kenyan kids are outdoors being physically active for as much as 3.5 hours every day – while dreaming of emulating their champion compatriots. It’s no wonder we’re lagging so far behind.
Can
Britain return to aerobic health and fall back in love with competitive
marathon running? There are glimmers of hope; at last November's Leeds Abbey Dash 10k, the top 82 runners finished inside 32 minutes – a greater
depth of quality than had been seen in recent years. A reinvigorated
domestic road running scene is a must if we are to revive a culture of
competitiveness and draw in new talent. Standards have slipped back a
long way, but a turnaround isn’t impossible. Mo Farah’s Olympic success
lifted the limit on our dreams by proving that Britons can still reach
the top; who knows what competitive hunger he can reawaken if he makes
his mark over 26.2.
Alternative theories for the decline
1980s, Derek Stevens
|
2010s, Jon Pepper
|
‘Trainers have become overly cushioned and heavy’
“I used to run in a pair of Tiger Cubs, which had no sole to them. It does make you wonder.”
|
“I’m dead against thick-soled, very cushioned shoes. We weren’t born with half an inch of rubber under our heels!”
|
‘Athletes aren’t as competitive anymore’
“I was quite ruthless to other athletes. I’ve been in fights in races before. It could be quite cruel.”
|
“Losing really does piss me off. If I’m really up for a race, I’ll talk it up in my mind to beat someone”
|
‘Football has become too popular, too dominant’
“That hasn’t changed. Back in the Eighties, we even had quite a good national team.”
|
“Aged 11-12, I was really into football but my team was awful. We lost regularly with double-figure scores!”
|
‘There isn’t a big enough financial incentive’
“It’s no different. The appearance and prize money in the Eighties was minimal. It was never a motivation, only a bonus.”
|
“I
don’t think anyone who’s a distance runner [in the UK] these days is
doing it for the money. If they were, they’d be an idiot!”
|
Going back to go forward
Super-ambitious
Michael Crawley, 26, decided to follow a training schedule from the
1980s in an attempt to emulate the success of his coach
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4xgnBM6OQtJFBd75g76O1r4jKF38OOA0qmZeXrZYKhzixUCdiGDN4d_u73HmSycgpmDZTsmdVI5pKYIupcOGPEyC9KIuoqoN_ikTMLmbHDRWAlqHfWTX3JkiI4I1cvu9TcHWPRqYgh8_H/s1600/Mike+Crawley_cr.jpg) |
Mike Crawley has made huge progress since following
his coach's schedule from the early-Eighties |
"At
the beginning of 2013, I persuaded my coach to lend me his training
diaries from 1981 and 1982 (when he ran a marathon best of 2:14). My
intention was to compare my training with his every week, using his
schedule as a template to build towards.
"The
diaries are heavy on numbers (9,037 miles, to be precise) and light on
description. By far the most frequently used adjective is “tired”, with
only occasional elaboration (“tired, knackered actually” or “eight miles
hard, 5.30am”). The sparseness of words on the page is a reminder of
how simple training really is; it involves, principally, a lot of
running.
"The
entry on 7th August, 1981, reads: “10 miles inc. 29mins 53.6secs for
10,000m (22nd), good.” Two days later: “22 miles alone – tired.” The
near-constant tiredness was getting him somewhere, then. In how many
races in Britain today would you expect to break 30 minutes for 10km and
finish outside of the top 20? (answer: none).
"After
I ran 50mins 52secs for 10 miles, in September, and finished second,
feeling quite pleased with myself, I found an entry where my coach had
run 50mins flat and finished outside the top five. I re-evaluated what
constituted good running.
"Since
then, I’ve built up my mileage to 100 miles most weeks, and run as many
as 110 on a few occasions. The change is probably best summed up in
‘more running, less worrying.’ I threw away my GPS and heart-rate
monitor and threw a decent chunk of caution to the wind. I stopped doing
easy runs unless I was really knackered, and core stability didn’t
exist in 1981, so that went too.
"One
session that particularly stands out involves running a set distance
(usually four miles) flat-out in the morning, then doing it again in the
evening, on the same course, and trying to go faster on tired legs.
This isn’t ‘tempo’ or ‘threshold’ running – those terms didn’t exist 30
years ago. It’s just called ‘hard’, and it is.
"I
realised early on that I wasn’t going to be able to replicate every
week of my coach’s training, but after five months my training diary is
looking a lot more like his. It now contains what he calls ‘proper’
training, and I’ve got faster – by 1min 20secs over a half marathon (new
PB, 66.52) and 50secs over 10km (new PB, 30.03).
"So
it turns out that training like runners did in the Eighties isn’t very
scientific, is often hard and very tiring, but it works!"
Other experts asked...
What is the single biggest cause of the decline in British marathon running since the Eighties?
“Modern, overprotective society. Kids are aerobic monsters and need to be let loose at every opportunity when young!”
Jon
Brown, former European Cross Country champion (1996) & twice fourth
in the Olympic Marathon (2000, 2004), with a 2:09:31 marathon PB (2005)
“Secular
trends in physical activity are primarily responsible for the general
demise in physical fitness, which in turn has had a devastating effect
on sporting performance. School and university sports, now almost
extinct in the UK in comparison to other countries, have done very
little to reverse this general demise in physical fitness with dire
consequences for health and sporting performance.”
Yannis Pitsiladis, Professor of Sport and Exercise Science at the University of Brighton
UK male marathon times 1980-2010 comparison
1st 10th 20th 50th 100th
2010 2:13:40 2:18:21 2:22:49 2:28:20 2:33:06
2005 2:09:31 2:18:47 2:24:02 2:29:49 2:35:20
2000 2:11:17 2:18:49 2:22:47 2:28:39 2:34:09
1995 2:10:31 2:15:02 2:20:17 2:24:57 2:29:57
1990 2:10:10 2:16:03 2:18:57 2:23:01 2:27:50
1985 2:07:13 2:14:20 2:15:31 2:18:34 2:21:31
1980 2:11:22 2:16:04 2:17:52 2:21:11 2:26:25
Top 10 UK marathons: now versus then
2013
1 2:15:04 Nicholas Torry
2 2:15:21 Dave Webb
3 2:15:52 Ben Moreau
4 2:16:50 Derek Hawkins
4 2:16:50 Craig Hopkins
6 2:17:43 John Gilbert
7 2:18:28 Ross Houston
8 2:18:50 Paul Martelletti
9 2:19:01 James Kelly
10 2:19:07 Phil Wicks
(11 2:19:10 Jon Pepper)
1984
1 2:08:05 Steve Jones
2 2:09:57 Charlie Spedding
3 2:10:08 Geoff Smith
4 2:11:41 Kevin Forster
5 2:11:49 Fraser Clyne
6 2:11:54 Hugh Jones
7 2:12:12 Dennis Fowles
8 2:12:41 Derek Stevens
9 2:13:24 Martin McCarthy
10 2:13:49 Jimmy Ashworth
Author's note
My
own marathon PB of 2:28:46, set in 2012, snuck inside the UK top 50
that year, a fact that I'd been tempted to regard as boast-worthy. During the
writing of this feature, my ego trip was brought to a crashing halt when I discovered that, had I been running in the mid-Eighties, my time wouldn't have
made the top 300!